Florida Dermatology Billing: The Vendor Evaluation Questions That Reveal CO-50 Defense and Mohs Billing Capability

-
Image
Choosing a medical billing or RCM vendor for a Florida dermatology practice requires more than comparing collection percentages and monthly fees. Dermatology billing has specialty-specific risks, particularly when a practice performs Mohs micrographic surgery, pathology-related services, biopsies, and other procedures where documentation, medical necessity, coding, and payer policies directly affect reimbursement. One important area to examine is the vendor's ability to prevent and defend CO-50 denials . CARC 50 indicates that a service was considered non-covered because the payer did not determine it to be medically necessary. CMS guidance also shows that CO-50 can be used following medical review when a payer determines that coverage requirements have not been met. For a Florida dermatology practice, the vendor evaluation process should therefore go beyond asking, "How much do you collect?" The better question is: "How do you protect our revenue when a payer challe...
Post a Comment

Skilled Nursing Facility (SNF) Consolidated Billing (CB)

-

 

Skilled Nursing Facility (SNF) Consolidated Billing (CB)

Consolidated Billing Background

Prior to the Balanced Budget Act of 1997 (BBA), an SNF could elect to furnish services to a resident in a covered Part A stay, either: directly, using its own resources; through the SNF’s transfer agreement hospital; or under arrangements with an independent therapist (for physical, occupational, and speech therapy services). In each of these circumstances, the SNF billed Medicare Part A for the services.

However, the SNF also had the further option of “unbundling” a service altogether; that is, the SNF could permit an outside supplier to furnish the service directly to the resident, and the outside supplier would submit a bill to Medicare Part B, without any involvement of the SNF itself.  This practice created several problems, including the following:

  • Potential for duplicate (Parts A/B) billing if both the SNF and outside supplier billed;
  • An increased out-of-pocket liability incurred by the beneficiary for the Part B deductible and coinsurance even if only the supplier billed; and
  • A dispersal of responsibility for resident care among various outside suppliers adversely affected the quality (coordination of care) and program integrity, as documented in reports by both the Office of the Inspector General (OIG) and the Government Accountability Office (GAO)

Congress then enacted the Balanced Budget Act of 1997 (BBA), Public Law 105-33, Section 4432(b), and it contains a Consolidated Billing (CB) requirement for SNFs.  Under the CB requirement, an SNF itself must submit all Medicare claims for the services that its residents receive (except for specifically excluded services listed below).

CB eliminates the potential for duplicative billings for the same service to the Part A fiscal intermediary by the SNF and the Part B carrier by an outside supplier. It also enhances the SNF’s capacity to meet its existing responsibility to oversee and coordinate the total package of care that each of its residents receives.

If you want to read the complete blog then click below: Skilled Nursing Facility (SNF) Consolidated Billing (CB)

Location: Oklahoma, USA

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Is Your Neurology Billing Outsourcing Helping or Hurting You at Year-End?

-
Image
  As year-end approaches, neurology practices face a crucial decision: Is your billing outsourcing truly improving your financial performance, or silently affecting your revenue? Neurology billing is complex due to time-based coding, modifier usage, high documentation requirements, frequent audits, and prior authorization challenges. If your billing partner lacks neurology-specific expertise, it may lead to claim denials, revenue loss, and compliance risks. Signs Your Neurology Billing Outsourcing Is Helping If your billing partner is performing well, you will see: • Reduced denial rates for neurology codes (EEG, EMG, Botox, Nerve Conduction Studies) • Faster reimbursements and fewer delays from payers • Active recovery of old AR beyond 60, 90, or 120+ days • Accurate CPT, ICD-10, and modifier usage for neurology procedures • Clear billing reports, denial analysis, and revenue insights • Compliance with Medicare, commercial payers, and documentation standards Warning ...
Read more

How Hidden OB-GYN Billing Errors Are Quietly Costing You Millions Each Year

-
Image
  The Silent Revenue Leak in OB-GYN Practices Most OB-GYN practices don’t realize they’re bleeding money. Not in dramatic, headline-grabbing ways, but quietly, steadily, month after month. The phones are ringing, appointment slots are full, deliveries are happening, and yet the numbers never seem to match the effort. Sound familiar? This is often the first sign of hidden OB-GYN billing errors working behind the scenes. These errors don’t announce themselves. They don’t crash your systems or send angry alerts. Instead, they slip through claims, hide in coding nuances, and quietly shave thousands—or millions—off your annual revenue. OB-GYN billing is uniquely complex compared to other specialties. Between global maternity packages, split billing scenarios, high-risk pregnancy coding, and ever-changing payer rules, the margin for error is enormous. A single missed modifier or incorrectly bundled service might seem insignificant on its own. But when repeated across hundreds or thousand...
Read more

The #1 Reason ASCs Lose Revenue from Medicare Claims (And How to Fix It)

-
Image
Ambulatory Surgical Centers don’t lose Medicare revenue because of low case volume. They lose it because of one recurring, preventable failure: Incorrect coding and documentation for Medicare’s ASC-specific payment rules. This single issue triggers denials, underpayments, delayed reimbursement, and permanent write-offs — especially at year-end. If your ASC’s Medicare revenue feels unpredictable, this is why. The #1 Revenue Killer: Not Billing Medicare the “ASC Way” Medicare does not treat ASCs like hospitals or physician offices. Yet many ASCs still: Use hospital-style assumptions Miss ASC-only payment rules Underestimate Medicare’s bundling logic The result? Claims get paid less than expected — or not at all. Where Medicare ASC Claims Go Wrong 1. Incorrect CPT eligibility for ASC payment Not every CPT code is payable in an ASC setting under Medicare. Common mistakes: Billing procedures not on Medicare’s ASC approved list Assuming “covered in hospital” = “covered in ASC” Missing annual...
Read more