Florida Dermatology Billing: The Vendor Evaluation Questions That Reveal CO-50 Defense and Mohs Billing Capability

-
Image
Choosing a medical billing or RCM vendor for a Florida dermatology practice requires more than comparing collection percentages and monthly fees. Dermatology billing has specialty-specific risks, particularly when a practice performs Mohs micrographic surgery, pathology-related services, biopsies, and other procedures where documentation, medical necessity, coding, and payer policies directly affect reimbursement. One important area to examine is the vendor's ability to prevent and defend CO-50 denials . CARC 50 indicates that a service was considered non-covered because the payer did not determine it to be medically necessary. CMS guidance also shows that CO-50 can be used following medical review when a payer determines that coverage requirements have not been met. For a Florida dermatology practice, the vendor evaluation process should therefore go beyond asking, "How much do you collect?" The better question is: "How do you protect our revenue when a payer challe...
Post a Comment

Impact of 2023 MPFS Proposed Rule on Neurology Billing

-

impactof2023mpfsproposedruleonneurologybilling.jpg

2023 Medicare Physician Fee Schedule Proposed Rule

Recently, the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS) released the CY 2023 revisions to payment policies under the Medicare Physician Fee Schedule (MPFS) and other changes to the Medicare part B payment policies (CMS-1770-P) proposed rule. In this article, we shared the impact of the 2023 MPFS proposed rule on neurology billing, the key points are as follows:

Impact of 2023 MPFS Proposed Rule on Neurology Billing

  • CMS shows the impact of the provisions of the rule to be a zero percent chance for neurosurgery. However, CMS proposes a CY 2023 conversion factor (CF) of 33.0775, which is a 4.42 percent (rounded to 4.5%) reduction relative to the CY 2022 CF of 34.6062, which comes in addition to the pending 4% pay-as-you-go cut that congress postponed last year and the resumption of the 2% annual Medicare payment sequester.
  • CMS received a request to designate CPT code 23091 (Allograft, structural, for spine surgery only) as potentially misvalued. CMS has disagreed with the rationale provided by the requester and is proposing not to designate the procedure as misvalued.
  • CMS is considering proposals to rebase and revise the Medicare Economic Index (MEI) cost share weights, and the agency is soliciting comments on this issue. The MEI measures the input prices for providing physician services. The agency proposes a new methodology allowing data to reflect better current market conditions for both physician ownership practices and self-employed physicians. It will also enable the MEI to be updated more frequently. The change would not impact the overall MPFS spending but could result in significant changes to payment for particular specialties. CMS is not proposing to use the updated MEI data to set payment rates for CY 2023 but is soliciting comments on future use.

To know more about the Impact of the 2023 MPFS Proposed Rule on Neurology Billing click here: http://bit.ly/3Zuoyn9 Contact us at info@medicalbillersandcoders.com/ 888-357-3226.

Location: United States

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Is Your Neurology Billing Outsourcing Helping or Hurting You at Year-End?

-
Image
  As year-end approaches, neurology practices face a crucial decision: Is your billing outsourcing truly improving your financial performance, or silently affecting your revenue? Neurology billing is complex due to time-based coding, modifier usage, high documentation requirements, frequent audits, and prior authorization challenges. If your billing partner lacks neurology-specific expertise, it may lead to claim denials, revenue loss, and compliance risks. Signs Your Neurology Billing Outsourcing Is Helping If your billing partner is performing well, you will see: • Reduced denial rates for neurology codes (EEG, EMG, Botox, Nerve Conduction Studies) • Faster reimbursements and fewer delays from payers • Active recovery of old AR beyond 60, 90, or 120+ days • Accurate CPT, ICD-10, and modifier usage for neurology procedures • Clear billing reports, denial analysis, and revenue insights • Compliance with Medicare, commercial payers, and documentation standards Warning ...
Read more

How Hidden OB-GYN Billing Errors Are Quietly Costing You Millions Each Year

-
Image
  The Silent Revenue Leak in OB-GYN Practices Most OB-GYN practices don’t realize they’re bleeding money. Not in dramatic, headline-grabbing ways, but quietly, steadily, month after month. The phones are ringing, appointment slots are full, deliveries are happening, and yet the numbers never seem to match the effort. Sound familiar? This is often the first sign of hidden OB-GYN billing errors working behind the scenes. These errors don’t announce themselves. They don’t crash your systems or send angry alerts. Instead, they slip through claims, hide in coding nuances, and quietly shave thousands—or millions—off your annual revenue. OB-GYN billing is uniquely complex compared to other specialties. Between global maternity packages, split billing scenarios, high-risk pregnancy coding, and ever-changing payer rules, the margin for error is enormous. A single missed modifier or incorrectly bundled service might seem insignificant on its own. But when repeated across hundreds or thousand...
Read more

The #1 Reason ASCs Lose Revenue from Medicare Claims (And How to Fix It)

-
Image
Ambulatory Surgical Centers don’t lose Medicare revenue because of low case volume. They lose it because of one recurring, preventable failure: Incorrect coding and documentation for Medicare’s ASC-specific payment rules. This single issue triggers denials, underpayments, delayed reimbursement, and permanent write-offs — especially at year-end. If your ASC’s Medicare revenue feels unpredictable, this is why. The #1 Revenue Killer: Not Billing Medicare the “ASC Way” Medicare does not treat ASCs like hospitals or physician offices. Yet many ASCs still: Use hospital-style assumptions Miss ASC-only payment rules Underestimate Medicare’s bundling logic The result? Claims get paid less than expected — or not at all. Where Medicare ASC Claims Go Wrong 1. Incorrect CPT eligibility for ASC payment Not every CPT code is payable in an ASC setting under Medicare. Common mistakes: Billing procedures not on Medicare’s ASC approved list Assuming “covered in hospital” = “covered in ASC” Missing annual...
Read more