Plastic Surgery Billing: Cosmetic vs Reconstructive and Payer Prior Auth

-
Image
  Plastic surgery billing becomes complex when practices must clearly distinguish between cosmetic and reconstructive procedures while managing strict payer prior authorization requirements. Misclassification, incomplete documentation, or missed authorizations can lead to denials, underpayments, and significant revenue loss. Plastic surgery operates across two very different financial models. Cosmetic procedures are typically patient-paid, while reconstructive surgeries are often covered by insurance when medical necessity is established. The challenge lies in ensuring that each case is properly documented, coded, and authorized before services are performed. Why Cosmetic vs Reconstructive Classification Matters The distinction between cosmetic and reconstructive surgery is critical for reimbursement. Cosmetic procedures are elective and not covered by insurance, whereas reconstructive procedures restore function or correct abnormalities and may qualify for payer coverage. If a re...
Post a Comment

Impact of 2023 MPFS Proposed Rule on Neurology Billing

-

impactof2023mpfsproposedruleonneurologybilling.jpg

2023 Medicare Physician Fee Schedule Proposed Rule

Recently, the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS) released the CY 2023 revisions to payment policies under the Medicare Physician Fee Schedule (MPFS) and other changes to the Medicare part B payment policies (CMS-1770-P) proposed rule. In this article, we shared the impact of the 2023 MPFS proposed rule on neurology billing, the key points are as follows:

Impact of 2023 MPFS Proposed Rule on Neurology Billing

  • CMS shows the impact of the provisions of the rule to be a zero percent chance for neurosurgery. However, CMS proposes a CY 2023 conversion factor (CF) of 33.0775, which is a 4.42 percent (rounded to 4.5%) reduction relative to the CY 2022 CF of 34.6062, which comes in addition to the pending 4% pay-as-you-go cut that congress postponed last year and the resumption of the 2% annual Medicare payment sequester.
  • CMS received a request to designate CPT code 23091 (Allograft, structural, for spine surgery only) as potentially misvalued. CMS has disagreed with the rationale provided by the requester and is proposing not to designate the procedure as misvalued.
  • CMS is considering proposals to rebase and revise the Medicare Economic Index (MEI) cost share weights, and the agency is soliciting comments on this issue. The MEI measures the input prices for providing physician services. The agency proposes a new methodology allowing data to reflect better current market conditions for both physician ownership practices and self-employed physicians. It will also enable the MEI to be updated more frequently. The change would not impact the overall MPFS spending but could result in significant changes to payment for particular specialties. CMS is not proposing to use the updated MEI data to set payment rates for CY 2023 but is soliciting comments on future use.

To know more about the Impact of the 2023 MPFS Proposed Rule on Neurology Billing click here: http://bit.ly/3Zuoyn9 Contact us at info@medicalbillersandcoders.com/ 888-357-3226.

Location: United States

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

How to Reduce Days in A/R with Smart Denial Management Strategies

-
Image
 Timely reimbursement is the lifeblood of a financially healthy medical practice. Yet, increasing Days in Accounts Receivable (A/R) continues to be one of the most pressing revenue cycle issues for healthcare providers. One of the major culprits behind this issue? Denials. In this blog, we explore how strategic denial management not only reduces days in A/R but also improves cash flow and strengthens your bottom line. Understanding Days in A/R Days in A/R refers to the average number of days it takes for a practice to collect payments due after services have been provided. Industry benchmarks typically suggest keeping A/R days under 35. Anything higher signals inefficiencies - and likely unresolved denials. How Claim Denials Affect A/R Denied claims delay payments and increase administrative burden. Without an effective process to identify, appeal, and correct them, your A/R days will climb - and revenue will suffer. Top causes of denials include: Missing or incorrect ...
Read more

How Outsourced Medical Billing Can Improve Your Practice’s Profitability

-
Image
Managing a medical practice comes with its fair share of challenges—from patient care to staffing and compliance. But one of the most overlooked factors impacting a practice’s financial health is inefficient billing . That’s where outsourced medical billing comes in—not just as a cost-cutting solution, but as a profitability booster . Here’s how outsourcing your medical billing can significantly improve your bottom line. 1. Reduced Administrative Costs Running an in-house billing department requires trained staff, billing software, continual updates, and compliance oversight. These overhead costs can add up quickly. Outsourcing eliminates the need for these expenses, allowing you to pay only for the services you use —often at a fraction of the cost. 2. Faster Claim Submission and Reimbursement Professional billing companies are equipped with experienced teams and advanced tools that ensure quick and accurate claim submission . This minimizes delays and accelerates cash flow , g...
Read more

Is Your Neurology Billing Outsourcing Helping or Hurting You at Year-End?

-
Image
  As year-end approaches, neurology practices face a crucial decision: Is your billing outsourcing truly improving your financial performance, or silently affecting your revenue? Neurology billing is complex due to time-based coding, modifier usage, high documentation requirements, frequent audits, and prior authorization challenges. If your billing partner lacks neurology-specific expertise, it may lead to claim denials, revenue loss, and compliance risks. Signs Your Neurology Billing Outsourcing Is Helping If your billing partner is performing well, you will see: • Reduced denial rates for neurology codes (EEG, EMG, Botox, Nerve Conduction Studies) • Faster reimbursements and fewer delays from payers • Active recovery of old AR beyond 60, 90, or 120+ days • Accurate CPT, ICD-10, and modifier usage for neurology procedures • Clear billing reports, denial analysis, and revenue insights • Compliance with Medicare, commercial payers, and documentation standards Warning ...
Read more