Why Surgeon Coding and Facility Claims Must Match — The ASC Synchronization Problem Payers Are Now Auditing

-
Image
Ambulatory surgery centers (ASCs) are facing increasing pressure to keep professional and facility claims consistent. A surgeon may submit a professional claim for a procedure while the ASC submits a separate facility claim for the same encounter. Although these claims serve different billing purposes, the clinical details behind them should tell the same story. When surgeon coding and facility claims do not match, payers may see inconsistencies that can trigger claim reviews, payment delays, downcoding, or denials. The problem is not always an incorrect CPT code. Sometimes the issue is that two correctly prepared claims do not appear synchronized. The ASC Synchronization Problem ASC billing involves multiple parties. The surgeon or physician group submits the professional claim, while the facility submits the institutional claim for the services and resources provided by the ASC. Both claims can contain different codes because they represent different components of the same encounter....
Post a Comment

Challenges and Opportunities of Durable Medical Equipment Practice (DME)

-

 

challengesandopportunitiesofdurablemedicalequipmentpracticedme.jpg

The necessity of Durable Medical Equipments (DMEs) had never been so high – in the U.S. 30% to 54% of those over 65 years have some form of disability; around 75% to 90% of such disabled require some form of DME to keep them mobile or enabled.  It is also estimated that around 1.5 million people are currently in need of wheelchairs and braces. And, when you add the population that is likely to be in need of other forms of durable medical equipment – prosthetics, orthotics, and supplies (DMEPOS) – it will be some opportunity for people involved in Durable Medical Equipment Practice Services: physicians, pharmacies, and manufacturers/suppliers. But, because DME services are physician-recommended, we are more interested in how physicians themselves can recommend, source, and administer DMEs.

While physicians can benefit immensely from an integrated DME management, there are challenges on the way – being equipped with a Medicare-enrolled and recognized pharmacy, sourcing supplies from bidders authorized by CMS, and showing up as participating suppliers, who accept Medicare-approved fees on DMEs.

Physicians who are willing to have pharmacies attached with Medicare Part B approval need to have full-fledged Medicare Part B recognized DME supplies.  The importance of having Medicare-approved DMEs at your pharmacy is that it enables patients to have access to DMEs that are fully covered and reimbursed from Medicare Part B.

DMEs cannot be freely traded at your pharmacy; you need to apply for authorization from CMS. First, you need to apply by filling up Form CMS-855S for all likely suppliers of durable medical equipment, prosthetics, orthotics, and supplies (DMEPOS). Applications are verified by National Supplier Clearinghouse (NSC) before being certified for compliance with DMEPOS Supplier Standards, as set forth in 42 CFR 424.57

Browse All: DME Medical Billing

Physicians in DME services are expected to be responsible – being responsible means agreeing to accept Medicare-approved amounts as full payment. Physicians that accept this clause will stand to collect only 20% of the approved amount after the patient has paid the part B deductible. Though not mandatory, being a partner in sharing monetary responsibility may have disguised benefits, such as goodwill and patient-initiated referrals.

To learn more about The Challenges and Opportunities of Durable Medical Equipment Practice (DME), click here: https://bit.ly/3WnOlwE Contact us at info@medicalbillersandcoders.com/ 888-357-3226.

Location: United States

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Is Your Neurology Billing Outsourcing Helping or Hurting You at Year-End?

-
Image
  As year-end approaches, neurology practices face a crucial decision: Is your billing outsourcing truly improving your financial performance, or silently affecting your revenue? Neurology billing is complex due to time-based coding, modifier usage, high documentation requirements, frequent audits, and prior authorization challenges. If your billing partner lacks neurology-specific expertise, it may lead to claim denials, revenue loss, and compliance risks. Signs Your Neurology Billing Outsourcing Is Helping If your billing partner is performing well, you will see: • Reduced denial rates for neurology codes (EEG, EMG, Botox, Nerve Conduction Studies) • Faster reimbursements and fewer delays from payers • Active recovery of old AR beyond 60, 90, or 120+ days • Accurate CPT, ICD-10, and modifier usage for neurology procedures • Clear billing reports, denial analysis, and revenue insights • Compliance with Medicare, commercial payers, and documentation standards Warning ...
Read more

How Hidden OB-GYN Billing Errors Are Quietly Costing You Millions Each Year

-
Image
  The Silent Revenue Leak in OB-GYN Practices Most OB-GYN practices don’t realize they’re bleeding money. Not in dramatic, headline-grabbing ways, but quietly, steadily, month after month. The phones are ringing, appointment slots are full, deliveries are happening, and yet the numbers never seem to match the effort. Sound familiar? This is often the first sign of hidden OB-GYN billing errors working behind the scenes. These errors don’t announce themselves. They don’t crash your systems or send angry alerts. Instead, they slip through claims, hide in coding nuances, and quietly shave thousands—or millions—off your annual revenue. OB-GYN billing is uniquely complex compared to other specialties. Between global maternity packages, split billing scenarios, high-risk pregnancy coding, and ever-changing payer rules, the margin for error is enormous. A single missed modifier or incorrectly bundled service might seem insignificant on its own. But when repeated across hundreds or thousand...
Read more

The #1 Reason ASCs Lose Revenue from Medicare Claims (And How to Fix It)

-
Image
Ambulatory Surgical Centers don’t lose Medicare revenue because of low case volume. They lose it because of one recurring, preventable failure: Incorrect coding and documentation for Medicare’s ASC-specific payment rules. This single issue triggers denials, underpayments, delayed reimbursement, and permanent write-offs — especially at year-end. If your ASC’s Medicare revenue feels unpredictable, this is why. The #1 Revenue Killer: Not Billing Medicare the “ASC Way” Medicare does not treat ASCs like hospitals or physician offices. Yet many ASCs still: Use hospital-style assumptions Miss ASC-only payment rules Underestimate Medicare’s bundling logic The result? Claims get paid less than expected — or not at all. Where Medicare ASC Claims Go Wrong 1. Incorrect CPT eligibility for ASC payment Not every CPT code is payable in an ASC setting under Medicare. Common mistakes: Billing procedures not on Medicare’s ASC approved list Assuming “covered in hospital” = “covered in ASC” Missing annual...
Read more