What Clean Claim Rate Should a Dermatology Billing Partner Actually Guarantee You?

-
Image
Choosing a dermatology billing partner based only on a promised clean claim rate can be misleading. A billing company may tell you that it maintains a 95%, 97%, or even 99% clean claim rate. But before accepting that number, you need to know how the rate is measured, what claims are included, and whether those clean claims are actually being paid correctly . For dermatology practices, this matters because a claim can pass an initial billing check and still face problems related to medical necessity, modifiers, procedure coding, payer policies, or underpayment. A clean claim rate should therefore be viewed as one part of the revenue cycle, not the entire performance picture. What Clean Claim Rate Should a Dermatology Billing Partner Guarantee? A reasonable contract target is 97% or higher , provided the billing partner clearly defines the metric and measures it consistently at the payer level. The percentage itself, however, is only part of the agreement. A dermatology practice should a...
Post a Comment

Avoiding Improper Medicare Payments for Surgical Dressings

-

 

avoidingimpropermedicarepaymentsforsurgicaldressings.jpg

Improper Payment Reasons

Durable Medical Equipment (DME) suppliers of surgical dressings and physicians submit claims for surgical dressings and CMS covers it under the surgical dressings benefit i.e., SSA Section 1861[s][5]. CMS recently published Medicare Fee-for-Service (FFS) improper Medicare payments rate for surgical dressings for the 2020 reporting period. For this reporting period, the improper payment rate for surgical dressings was 67.3 percent, with a projected improper payment amount of over $194.9 million. For the 2020 reporting period, insufficient documentation accounted for 82.4 percent of improper Medicare payments for surgical dressings. Additional types of errors for surgical dressings in the 2020 reporting period were no documentation (1.9 percent), medical necessity (1.7 percent), incorrect coding (1.9 percent), and other (12.2 percent). 

Avoiding Improper Medicare Payments

All claims billed to Medicare require a written order or prescription from the treating practitioner as a condition for payment. The written order or prescription must meet the requirements outlined for the Standard Written Order (SWO). Billing guidelines would require you to communicate an SWO to the supplier before claim submission. Certain items of Durable Medical Equipment, Prosthetics, Orthotics, & Supplies (DMEPOS), require a Written Order Prior to Delivery (WOPD) of the item(s) to the patient.

Billing guidelines for surgical dressings would require an SWO containing all the following elements:

  • Patient’s name or Medicare Beneficiary Identifier (MBI)
  • Order Date
  • General description of item:
    • Description can be either a general description (for example, wheelchair or hospital bed), an HCPCS code, an HCPCS code narrative, or a brand name and model number
    • For equipment: Besides the description of the base item, the SWO may include all concurrently ordered options, accessories, or other features separately billed or require an upgraded code (list each separately)
    • For supplies: Besides a description of the base item, the DMEPOS order or prescription may include all concurrently ordered supplies separately billed (list each separately)
  • Dispensed quantity, if applicable
  • Treating practitioner name or National Provider Identifier (NPI)
  • Treating practitioner’s signature

To learn more about Avoiding Improper Medicare Payments for Surgical Dressings, click here: https://bit.ly/3Ji2ENU Contact us at info@medicalbillersandcoders.com/ 888-357-3226.

Location: United States

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Is Your Neurology Billing Outsourcing Helping or Hurting You at Year-End?

-
Image
  As year-end approaches, neurology practices face a crucial decision: Is your billing outsourcing truly improving your financial performance, or silently affecting your revenue? Neurology billing is complex due to time-based coding, modifier usage, high documentation requirements, frequent audits, and prior authorization challenges. If your billing partner lacks neurology-specific expertise, it may lead to claim denials, revenue loss, and compliance risks. Signs Your Neurology Billing Outsourcing Is Helping If your billing partner is performing well, you will see: • Reduced denial rates for neurology codes (EEG, EMG, Botox, Nerve Conduction Studies) • Faster reimbursements and fewer delays from payers • Active recovery of old AR beyond 60, 90, or 120+ days • Accurate CPT, ICD-10, and modifier usage for neurology procedures • Clear billing reports, denial analysis, and revenue insights • Compliance with Medicare, commercial payers, and documentation standards Warning ...
Read more

How Hidden OB-GYN Billing Errors Are Quietly Costing You Millions Each Year

-
Image
  The Silent Revenue Leak in OB-GYN Practices Most OB-GYN practices don’t realize they’re bleeding money. Not in dramatic, headline-grabbing ways, but quietly, steadily, month after month. The phones are ringing, appointment slots are full, deliveries are happening, and yet the numbers never seem to match the effort. Sound familiar? This is often the first sign of hidden OB-GYN billing errors working behind the scenes. These errors don’t announce themselves. They don’t crash your systems or send angry alerts. Instead, they slip through claims, hide in coding nuances, and quietly shave thousands—or millions—off your annual revenue. OB-GYN billing is uniquely complex compared to other specialties. Between global maternity packages, split billing scenarios, high-risk pregnancy coding, and ever-changing payer rules, the margin for error is enormous. A single missed modifier or incorrectly bundled service might seem insignificant on its own. But when repeated across hundreds or thousand...
Read more

Why High-Volume Primary Care Clinics Still Struggle with Cash Flow in 2026

-
Image
Patient volume alone does not guarantee financial success. Many high-volume primary care clinics are seeing more patients than ever in 2026, yet they continue to experience declining cash flow, increasing accounts receivable (AR), and inconsistent monthly collections. Despite busy schedules and full appointment books, reimbursement delays, payer denials, coding errors, and administrative inefficiencies often prevent practices from converting clinical activity into predictable revenue. Today's primary care environment is more complex than ever. Evaluation and Management (E/M) coding updates, Medicare Advantage policies, commercial payer requirements, prior authorization rules, and preventive care reimbursement all contribute to a challenging revenue cycle. This is why many providers are asking: Why do high-volume primary care clinics still struggle with cash flow in 2026? The answer often lies within the billing process. Practices that invest in specialized Primary Care Billing Ser...
Read more