Florida Dermatology Billing: The Vendor Evaluation Questions That Reveal CO-50 Defense and Mohs Billing Capability

-
Image
Choosing a medical billing or RCM vendor for a Florida dermatology practice requires more than comparing collection percentages and monthly fees. Dermatology billing has specialty-specific risks, particularly when a practice performs Mohs micrographic surgery, pathology-related services, biopsies, and other procedures where documentation, medical necessity, coding, and payer policies directly affect reimbursement. One important area to examine is the vendor's ability to prevent and defend CO-50 denials . CARC 50 indicates that a service was considered non-covered because the payer did not determine it to be medically necessary. CMS guidance also shows that CO-50 can be used following medical review when a payer determines that coverage requirements have not been met. For a Florida dermatology practice, the vendor evaluation process should therefore go beyond asking, "How much do you collect?" The better question is: "How do you protect our revenue when a payer challe...
Post a Comment

Avoiding Improper Medicare Payments for Surgical Dressings

-

 

avoidingimpropermedicarepaymentsforsurgicaldressings.jpg

Improper Payment Reasons

Durable Medical Equipment (DME) suppliers of surgical dressings and physicians submit claims for surgical dressings and CMS covers it under the surgical dressings benefit i.e., SSA Section 1861[s][5]. CMS recently published Medicare Fee-for-Service (FFS) improper Medicare payments rate for surgical dressings for the 2020 reporting period. For this reporting period, the improper payment rate for surgical dressings was 67.3 percent, with a projected improper payment amount of over $194.9 million. For the 2020 reporting period, insufficient documentation accounted for 82.4 percent of improper Medicare payments for surgical dressings. Additional types of errors for surgical dressings in the 2020 reporting period were no documentation (1.9 percent), medical necessity (1.7 percent), incorrect coding (1.9 percent), and other (12.2 percent). 

Avoiding Improper Medicare Payments

All claims billed to Medicare require a written order or prescription from the treating practitioner as a condition for payment. The written order or prescription must meet the requirements outlined for the Standard Written Order (SWO). Billing guidelines would require you to communicate an SWO to the supplier before claim submission. Certain items of Durable Medical Equipment, Prosthetics, Orthotics, & Supplies (DMEPOS), require a Written Order Prior to Delivery (WOPD) of the item(s) to the patient.

Billing guidelines for surgical dressings would require an SWO containing all the following elements:

  • Patient’s name or Medicare Beneficiary Identifier (MBI)
  • Order Date
  • General description of item:
    • Description can be either a general description (for example, wheelchair or hospital bed), an HCPCS code, an HCPCS code narrative, or a brand name and model number
    • For equipment: Besides the description of the base item, the SWO may include all concurrently ordered options, accessories, or other features separately billed or require an upgraded code (list each separately)
    • For supplies: Besides a description of the base item, the DMEPOS order or prescription may include all concurrently ordered supplies separately billed (list each separately)
  • Dispensed quantity, if applicable
  • Treating practitioner name or National Provider Identifier (NPI)
  • Treating practitioner’s signature

To learn more about Avoiding Improper Medicare Payments for Surgical Dressings, click here: https://bit.ly/3Ji2ENU Contact us at info@medicalbillersandcoders.com/ 888-357-3226.

Location: United States

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Is Your Neurology Billing Outsourcing Helping or Hurting You at Year-End?

-
Image
  As year-end approaches, neurology practices face a crucial decision: Is your billing outsourcing truly improving your financial performance, or silently affecting your revenue? Neurology billing is complex due to time-based coding, modifier usage, high documentation requirements, frequent audits, and prior authorization challenges. If your billing partner lacks neurology-specific expertise, it may lead to claim denials, revenue loss, and compliance risks. Signs Your Neurology Billing Outsourcing Is Helping If your billing partner is performing well, you will see: • Reduced denial rates for neurology codes (EEG, EMG, Botox, Nerve Conduction Studies) • Faster reimbursements and fewer delays from payers • Active recovery of old AR beyond 60, 90, or 120+ days • Accurate CPT, ICD-10, and modifier usage for neurology procedures • Clear billing reports, denial analysis, and revenue insights • Compliance with Medicare, commercial payers, and documentation standards Warning ...
Read more

How Hidden OB-GYN Billing Errors Are Quietly Costing You Millions Each Year

-
Image
  The Silent Revenue Leak in OB-GYN Practices Most OB-GYN practices don’t realize they’re bleeding money. Not in dramatic, headline-grabbing ways, but quietly, steadily, month after month. The phones are ringing, appointment slots are full, deliveries are happening, and yet the numbers never seem to match the effort. Sound familiar? This is often the first sign of hidden OB-GYN billing errors working behind the scenes. These errors don’t announce themselves. They don’t crash your systems or send angry alerts. Instead, they slip through claims, hide in coding nuances, and quietly shave thousands—or millions—off your annual revenue. OB-GYN billing is uniquely complex compared to other specialties. Between global maternity packages, split billing scenarios, high-risk pregnancy coding, and ever-changing payer rules, the margin for error is enormous. A single missed modifier or incorrectly bundled service might seem insignificant on its own. But when repeated across hundreds or thousand...
Read more

The #1 Reason ASCs Lose Revenue from Medicare Claims (And How to Fix It)

-
Image
Ambulatory Surgical Centers don’t lose Medicare revenue because of low case volume. They lose it because of one recurring, preventable failure: Incorrect coding and documentation for Medicare’s ASC-specific payment rules. This single issue triggers denials, underpayments, delayed reimbursement, and permanent write-offs — especially at year-end. If your ASC’s Medicare revenue feels unpredictable, this is why. The #1 Revenue Killer: Not Billing Medicare the “ASC Way” Medicare does not treat ASCs like hospitals or physician offices. Yet many ASCs still: Use hospital-style assumptions Miss ASC-only payment rules Underestimate Medicare’s bundling logic The result? Claims get paid less than expected — or not at all. Where Medicare ASC Claims Go Wrong 1. Incorrect CPT eligibility for ASC payment Not every CPT code is payable in an ASC setting under Medicare. Common mistakes: Billing procedures not on Medicare’s ASC approved list Assuming “covered in hospital” = “covered in ASC” Missing annual...
Read more