Florida Dermatology Billing: The Vendor Evaluation Questions That Reveal CO-50 Defense and Mohs Billing Capability

-
Image
Choosing a medical billing or RCM vendor for a Florida dermatology practice requires more than comparing collection percentages and monthly fees. Dermatology billing has specialty-specific risks, particularly when a practice performs Mohs micrographic surgery, pathology-related services, biopsies, and other procedures where documentation, medical necessity, coding, and payer policies directly affect reimbursement. One important area to examine is the vendor's ability to prevent and defend CO-50 denials . CARC 50 indicates that a service was considered non-covered because the payer did not determine it to be medically necessary. CMS guidance also shows that CO-50 can be used following medical review when a payer determines that coverage requirements have not been met. For a Florida dermatology practice, the vendor evaluation process should therefore go beyond asking, "How much do you collect?" The better question is: "How do you protect our revenue when a payer challe...
Post a Comment

Understanding Physician Self-Referral Law (Stark Law)

-

 

understandingphysicianselfreferrallawstarklaw.jpg

Physician Self-Referral Law (Stark Law) Basics

The Physician Self-Referral Law, commonly referred to as the Stark law, prohibits physicians from referring patients to receive Designated Health Services (DHS) payable by Medicare or Medicaid from entities with which the physician or an immediate family member has a financial relationship unless an exception applies. Financial relationships include both ownership/investment interests and compensation arrangements. The term Stark Law refers to former U.S. Representative Pete Stark of California, who originally introduced the physician ethics bill in the late 1980s that would later evolve into this law. At that time, healthcare services were provided mostly on a fee-for-service basis, meaning that healthcare providers (HCPs) were paid a predetermined amount for each type of service performed, rather than the current value-based system that focuses more on patient outcomes. 

The fee-for-service healthcare delivery system encouraged physicians to focus on the number of procedures, patients, and claims filed versus how well the patients’ health goals were being met by these services. While the Stark Law originally only applied to physician referrals for clinical laboratory services, it has since been expanded to include a variety of health services and provider types. For example, if you invest in an imaging center, the Stark law requires the resulting financial relationship to fit within an exception or you may not refer patients to the facility and the entity may not bill for the referred imaging services. The following items or services are Designated Health Services (DHS):

  • Clinical laboratory services.
  • Physical therapy services.
  • Occupational therapy services.
  • Outpatient speech-language pathology services.
  • Radiology and certain other imaging services.
  • Radiation therapy services and supplies.
  • Durable medical equipment and supplies.
  • Parenteral and enteral nutrients, equipment, and supplies.
  • Prosthetics, orthotics, and prosthetic devices and supplies.
  • Home health services.
  • Outpatient prescription drugs.
  • Inpatient and outpatient hospital services.

The Stark Law Consists of Three Components: 

  • It prohibits healthcare providers from referring Medicare patients for certain health services to a business in which the physician has a financial or familial interest. 
  • The law also prohibits the billing of Medicare or other insurance providers for health services when an improper physician referral is made. 
  • Finally, the law establishes several exceptions to the two provisions above and grants the secretary of the Department of Health and Human Services the authority to create specific exceptions for referrals to entities or medical provider businesses that will not result in a conflict of interest.

To learn more about Understanding Physician Self-Referral Law (Stark Law), click here: https://bit.ly/45s0Xpx, Contact us at info@medicalbillersandcoders.com/ 888-357-3226.

Location: United States

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Is Your Neurology Billing Outsourcing Helping or Hurting You at Year-End?

-
Image
  As year-end approaches, neurology practices face a crucial decision: Is your billing outsourcing truly improving your financial performance, or silently affecting your revenue? Neurology billing is complex due to time-based coding, modifier usage, high documentation requirements, frequent audits, and prior authorization challenges. If your billing partner lacks neurology-specific expertise, it may lead to claim denials, revenue loss, and compliance risks. Signs Your Neurology Billing Outsourcing Is Helping If your billing partner is performing well, you will see: • Reduced denial rates for neurology codes (EEG, EMG, Botox, Nerve Conduction Studies) • Faster reimbursements and fewer delays from payers • Active recovery of old AR beyond 60, 90, or 120+ days • Accurate CPT, ICD-10, and modifier usage for neurology procedures • Clear billing reports, denial analysis, and revenue insights • Compliance with Medicare, commercial payers, and documentation standards Warning ...
Read more

How Hidden OB-GYN Billing Errors Are Quietly Costing You Millions Each Year

-
Image
  The Silent Revenue Leak in OB-GYN Practices Most OB-GYN practices don’t realize they’re bleeding money. Not in dramatic, headline-grabbing ways, but quietly, steadily, month after month. The phones are ringing, appointment slots are full, deliveries are happening, and yet the numbers never seem to match the effort. Sound familiar? This is often the first sign of hidden OB-GYN billing errors working behind the scenes. These errors don’t announce themselves. They don’t crash your systems or send angry alerts. Instead, they slip through claims, hide in coding nuances, and quietly shave thousands—or millions—off your annual revenue. OB-GYN billing is uniquely complex compared to other specialties. Between global maternity packages, split billing scenarios, high-risk pregnancy coding, and ever-changing payer rules, the margin for error is enormous. A single missed modifier or incorrectly bundled service might seem insignificant on its own. But when repeated across hundreds or thousand...
Read more

The #1 Reason ASCs Lose Revenue from Medicare Claims (And How to Fix It)

-
Image
Ambulatory Surgical Centers don’t lose Medicare revenue because of low case volume. They lose it because of one recurring, preventable failure: Incorrect coding and documentation for Medicare’s ASC-specific payment rules. This single issue triggers denials, underpayments, delayed reimbursement, and permanent write-offs — especially at year-end. If your ASC’s Medicare revenue feels unpredictable, this is why. The #1 Revenue Killer: Not Billing Medicare the “ASC Way” Medicare does not treat ASCs like hospitals or physician offices. Yet many ASCs still: Use hospital-style assumptions Miss ASC-only payment rules Underestimate Medicare’s bundling logic The result? Claims get paid less than expected — or not at all. Where Medicare ASC Claims Go Wrong 1. Incorrect CPT eligibility for ASC payment Not every CPT code is payable in an ASC setting under Medicare. Common mistakes: Billing procedures not on Medicare’s ASC approved list Assuming “covered in hospital” = “covered in ASC” Missing annual...
Read more